Home
Editorial
Columns
Contributions
Advertising
Photo Gallery
Back Issues
About Us/History
Contact
A longtime resident of Uxbridge, Ted Barris has written professionally for 40 years - for radio, television, magazines and newspapers. The "Barris Beat" column began in the 1950s when his father Alex wrote for the Globe and Mail. Ted continues the tradition of offering a positive view of his community. He has written 16 non-fiction books of Canadian history and teaches journalism at Centennial College in Toronto. |
  |
June 30, 2011
June 23, 2011
June 16, 2011
June 09, 2011
June 2, 2011
May 26, 2011
May 19, 2011
May 12, 2011
May 5, 2011
April 28, 2011
April 21, 2011
April 14, 2011
April 07, 2011
March 31, 2011
March 24, 2011
March 17, 2011
March 10, 2011
March 3, 2011
February 24, 2011
Feb 17, 2011
Feb 10, 2011
Feb 03, 2011
Jan 27, 2011
Jan 20, 2011
Jan 13, 2011
Jan 06, 2011
December 23, 2010
Dec 16, 2010
Dec 9, 2010
Dec 2, 2010
Nov 25, 2010
Nov 18, 2010
Nov 11, 2010
Nov 4, 2010
Oct 28, 2010
Sept 23, 2010
Sept 16, 2010
Sept 09, 2010
Sept 02, 2010
Aug 26, 2010
19, 2010
Aug 12, 2010
Aug 05, 2010
July 29, 2010
July 22, 2010
July 15, 2010
June 30, 2010
June 24, 2010
June 17, 2010
June 10, 2010
June 03, 2010
May 27, 2010
May 20, 2010
May 13, 2010
May 6, 2010
April 29, 2010
April 22, 2010
April 15, 2010
April 8, 2010
April 1, 2010
March 25, 2010
March 18, 2010
March 11, 2010
March 4, 2010
Feb 25, 2010
Feb 18, 2010
Feb 11, 2010
Feb 04, 2010
Jan 28, 2010
Jan 21, 2010
Jan 14, 2010
Jan 07, 2010
Dec 24, 2009
Dec 17, 2009
Dec 10, 2009
Dec 3, 2009
Nov 26, 2009
Nov 19, 2009
Nov 12, 2009
Nov 05, 2009
Oct 29, 2009
Oct 22, 2009
Oct 15, 2009
Oct 8, 2009
Oct 1, 2009
Sept 10, 2009
Sept 06, 2009
Aug 27, 2009
Aug 20, 2009
Aug 13, 2009
Aug 06, 2009
July 30, 2009
July 23, 2009
July 16, 2009
July 9, 2009
June 18, 2009
June 6, 2009
May 28, 2009
May 14, 2009
May 07, 2009
April 30, 2009
April 23, 2009
April 16, 2009
April 09, 2009
April 02, 2009
March 26, 2009
March 19, 2009
March 12, 2009
March 05, 2009
Feb 26, 2009
Feb 19, 2009
Feb 05, 2009
Jan 29, 2009
Jan 21, 2009
Jan 15, 2009
Jan 08, 2009
Dec 24 2008 |
Still a noble profession
Last winter, during one of the daily meetings with my staff at the Toronto Observer (the online newspaper produced by senior journalism students at Centennial College where I teach), one of my student reporters faced a dilemma. We had assigned her to attend the funeral of Sgt. Ryan Russell, the Toronto Police Service officer killed by a stolen pickup truck with a snow plow. It was too late for her to get a press pass to the funeral. So how, she wondered, would she get into the ceremony?
“Do I hide the fact I'm a reporter?” she asked.
“No,” I said. “It's a public funeral. You should be able to get in. But if they ask you not to take photographs, respect their wishes.”
The young woman managed to get into the Toronto Convention Centre with the throngs of citizens, police mourners and family members. She was asked not to take pictures inside the centre and complied. During the ceremony, however, she made notes; then outside the centre interviewed mourners and took some photos. She then wrote one of the best stories of her young career and illustrated this important story of public support for the Russell family and fellow officers in mourning. As with the other media present, our novice reporter contributed mightily to the public's right to know.
I offer you this exhibit in what has become - in the past week - a public debate over the ethical or unethical behaviour of the media. On Sunday, the 168-year-old British tabloid - the News of the World - published its last newspaper. Australian media mogul Rupert Murdoch actually travelled to the U.K. to preside over the final edition. He and its controversial editor Rebekah Brooks could no longer defend the paper against allegations of hacking the phones of murder victims, dead soldiers and royal family members. It's alleged police are also investigating the World's senior executives for lying to Parliament. As a consequence of the scandal, I'm afraid all journalists are being improperly tarred with the “unethical” brush.
“The media have too much power,” I've heard friends and politicians criticize. To which I generally respond with such thoughts as these:
If not for Toronto publisher George Brown, who created the Globe newspaper in 1844, Canada might not have won responsible government. If not for one of his reporters, Kathleen “Kit” Coleman, women may not have won equal rights in this country. The wit and tenacity of Calgary Eye Opener publisher/writer Bob Edwards almost certainly blazed the trail to public criticism of politicians (in the early 1900s, he won a suit against him by an Alberta premier). Later, Stevie Cameron exposed the corruption and greed in the Brian Mulroney administration. And during the War on Terror in Afghanistan, journalists Rosie Dimanno, Murray Brewster and Christie Blatchford have gone beyond wartime embedding with NATO troops in the Middle East to reveal the actual stories of Canadian troops at the front line.
Among many U.S. examples, it was Joseph Pulitzer who crusaded for the rights of immigrants, the poor and the working class; Ray Stannard Baker, who exposed the Jim Crow laws and black lynching; Nellie Bly (a.k.a. Elizabeth Cochrane) who revealed atrocious conditions of asylums; and it was the dogged journalism of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein at the Washington Post, that forced perhaps the most crooked and deceiving president in U.S. history - Richard M. Nixon - and his policies from office.
By the way, just as a postscript to citing examples of the value and importance of free and unencumbered journalism and media, may I also point out two rather interesting historical coincidences. Today, July 14, in addition to being Bastille Day, the day the French people rose up in revolution against an oppressive monarchy in 1789, also marks the day in 1933 when Hitler abolished all political parties but the Nazi Party; he had also long since exterminated free speech and opposition journalism - something some 44,000 Canadians died to restore in the world.
And before anyone gloats “holier than thou” over the demise of the News of the World, might I suggest that perhaps the newspaper's accusers could be just as guilty. If the public felt the World was so fictitious, salacious and unethical, why did it still command the largest readership in Britain (at its peak in 1951 more than 8 million copies a week). To borrow from Shakespeare: “The fault is not in our stars, but in ourselves.”
One day, I hope my young Centennial College journalism protégé, whose first assignment was getting into the Ryan Russell funeral so that the public could know, has a chance to wield as much power as a Rebekah Brooks or a Rupert Murdoch. I'm sure she'll uphold the same standards of her predecessors and meet the expectations of you, her readers.
|